Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The corrected error-correction workflow creates an independent fragment attributed to the Correction node and marked with a human source, replaces the claim to reference that fragment, and starts with confidence 0.0 while carrying confidence_kind.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedBefore modifying the Prompt again, first read several complete records of Agent failures; usually you will find the root cause lies in tool design (misreading tools, being flooded by output, repeatedly retrying on errors it cannot understand), rather than in the Prompt itself.69% similarUnverifiedThe first version of Afterhack's correction code copied the evidence of the old claim directly onto the new claim, causing the replacement claim to point to the old evidence, with confidence set to 1.0.68% similarUnverifiedSending only the failed node and validation errors rather than the entire generated data stream during retries is the most straightforward subtraction optimization, provided that error information can be precisely localized.68% similarUnverifiedAfter correcting the word coordinates in the correction adapter, all five annotated repetition events were successfully recovered, indicating that baseline failures sometimes stem from annotation interface or data coordinate errors rather than the algorithm itself.67% similarUnverifiedThe self-repair mechanism requires error messages to be precise and actionable; a structured error list enumerating specific issues performs better than vague feedback.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065330API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065330MCP
get_claim(id=1065330)