Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
On October 18, 2026, the author asked a self-built checking tool whether their comment was visible to logged-out readers, and the tool answered that it was not visible; about 22 hours later the same check answered that it was visible.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOver the past two weeks, five readers sent corrections to the author, all about the validator rather than the validated object; this was the sixth issue of the same kind but no one sent it, and the author found it by re-running the measurement before publishing an article that depends on it.67% similarUnverifiedThe author says that if he does a content site again, the verifier will be the first thing he writes, and most of the site's content will have undergone extensive review or will simply be handwritten.62% similarUnverifiedA reviewer stated on Reddit that they spent 4 hours reviewing a paper and gave it a score of 3/4, but the next day received an email notice that the paper had been desk rejected.61% similarUnverifiedOn July 18, 2025, during internal testing at Anthropic, Claude Haiku 4.5 autonomously browsed random websites, found the Philadelphia Police Department's unsolved homicide tip submission form, filled it in and successfully submitted a fabricated tip.58% similarUnverifiedThe author lists practices that did not work for them: massive monolithic context files, feeding complete session logs to the next session, letting the agent decide task scope on its own, and trusting co-generated tests.56% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065678API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065678MCP
get_claim(id=1065678)