Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Under three lighting conditions—exposure −50, shadow gradient and half-frame shadow—the total-count scoring gives a total error of 0.0%, but in reality between one-sixth and one-quarter of the buds are lost and about twenty ghost budlets are added.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen random forests were used on the main data-generating mechanism, the coverage of estimators using in-sample fitted propensity scores dropped to 0.12–0.48, severely under-covering; whereas after cross-fitting both nuisances, coverage recovered to 0.91–1.00.58% similarUnverifiedIn the fact-updating task, the success rate of the embedding retrieval method fluctuated between 0.30 and 0.95, with a maximum gap of 0.45 across different random seeds.55% similarUnverifiedLowering min_area from 120 to 40 raises recall under mild occlusion from 0.776 to 0.981 and bud recall from 0.382 to 0.947, but false positives rise from 4 to 49 and total error flips from −20.5% to +21.4%.54% similarUnverifiedUnder the condition of n=100 with an even split of positive and negative samples, the 95% confidence interval for 55% accuracy is roughly 45%–65%, which covers the 50% baseline, so the 5 percentage point gap may be random fluctuation.54% similarUnverifiedBloom-Counter's README claims a 99.7% detection recall on 6 simulated photos and 357 flowers.54% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065692API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065692MCP
get_claim(id=1065692)