Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The research team evaluated SPLIT on seven benchmarks, covering math, science QA, code, and software engineering agents, involving 26 models, 175 agent systems, and six real verifiers, all from public releases.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe research team selected 8 models spanning different capability tiers and conducted cross-evaluations across 54 benchmarks73% similarUnverifiedThe research team evaluated seven state-of-the-art large language models.70% similarUnverifiedThe researchers constructed a benchmark test set called ALIGNMENTFORECASTBENCH, covering more than 5,000 prediction questions, 17 target models, 32 datasets, and 16 failure modes.70% similarUnverifiedThe GAUGE study covered 25 agents from six providers and tested them on two benchmarks: τ²-bench and SimulatorArena.70% similarUnverifiedThe benchmark tested 18 models from six labs in a single run, covering Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, DeepSeek, Qwen, and GLM.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065989API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065989MCP
get_claim(id=1065989)