Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The author's practical decision rules: record once and replay many times while shaping prompts or parsers; replay directly when only post-processing code changes; record separately and key by alias when comparing model aliases; make real calls when checking the provider's current behavior; use replay for CI regression gates; use real calls for load or latency testing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedRisk approval rules should be written into code rather than prompts, because prompts drift with repeated editing while code goes through review and test coverage.69% similarUnverifiedWhen using this workflow, attention should still be paid to transcription accuracy, the reliability of agent-generated code, and whether automated PRs conform to project standards; the agent's output should serve as a starting point rather than an endpoint and requires human review.67% similarUnverifiedAutomatic refactoring suggestions still require human review; the semantic correctness of code, boundary conditions, and team coding standards still depend on developer judgment in the short term.66% similarUnverifiedIn practice, contract testing or record-and-replay mechanisms are usually introduced, using fixed samples to verify whether an adapter still parses correctly after a protocol change, limiting the risk of version drift to a controllable range.66% similarUnverifiedLayered testing approaches for Agents include: unit-testing loop termination decisions with fixed inputs, replacing tools with stubs to verify the orchestrator's error handling, and regression-testing policy interception rules with recorded historical tool results.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1066606API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1066606MCP
get_claim(id=1066606)