Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
When validating citations, the citations given by the model should be compared against the set of document IDs actually placed in the context, and anything with no citations or with hallucinated documents must not be sent.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe requireEvidence option is enabled by default, and any value lacking a source-text quote is placed into unverifiedFields.74% similarUnverifiedA valid citation ID can only prove that the cited passage exists, not that the passage supports the claim in the answer.73% similarUnverifiedThe instruction itself does not guarantee that the model will comply, and the cited content still needs to be checked manually; 'requiring citations' reduces the risk, but does not eliminate it.71% similarUnverifiedThe existence of a DOI only proves that some identifier has been registered and does not guarantee that the content it points to matches the citation's description; when verifying a citation, one must open the DOI landing page and check the title, authors, journal, volume/issue, and page numbers.71% similarUnverifiedA single unverifiable citation is enough to constitute grounds for rejection, and the journal offers no opportunity for revision and resubmission.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1066629API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1066629MCP
get_claim(id=1066629)