Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Confidence self-reported by large models is usually uncalibrated and cannot be directly read as a probability of risk; it can only be used as a ranking signal.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe output of large models is probabilistic and cannot be simply judged for equality, so they cannot be tested using traditional assertion methods.78% similarUnverifiedAn abstention mechanism cannot rely solely on the model's self-assessment; it also requires external calibration methods or the variance of ensemble predictions from multiple models to estimate true uncertainty.76% similarUnverifiedThe safety guardrails of large models are essentially probabilistic constraints rather than hard logical guarantees, and it is impossible to mathematically prove that a model is absolutely safe.75% similarUnverifiedNeural network models tend to be overconfident, and their probability outputs do not faithfully reflect the credibility of predictions, exhibiting calibration problems.75% similarUnverifiedHaving a large model both make decisions and provide reasoning carries a risk: the reasoning the model provides may be a post-hoc rationalization of an already generated conclusion rather than the true basis for the decision.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1066631API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1066631MCP
get_claim(id=1066631)