Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Paluch recommends that agent security review start on paper: first list the agent's tools, the data it can reach and the actions it can execute, rather than going straight to a scanner.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn terms of skill security, the scanner is responsible for filtering, and humans are responsible for deciding; line-by-line manual review cannot be omitted.69% similarUnverifiedIntroducing agents into security reviews should serve as a supplement to existing automation rather than a replacement; stable, rule-based checks that are running well do not need to be rebuilt from scratch.69% similarUnverifiedAgentScope's tool review mechanism classifies tools by risk level, and the system automatically performs security checks when sensitive tools are invoked.69% similarUnverifiedThe pre-deployment scanner checks for risks such as prompt injection phrases, instruction hijacking, exfiltration instructions, dangerous capabilities, credential collection, and unauthenticated access.69% similarUnverifiedInclude secret protection in the code review checklist, but more importantly, let automated tools do the first round of filtering.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1066731API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1066731MCP
get_claim(id=1066731)