Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On a Python function repair task containing two bugs (215 hidden tests), all 12 runs of MiniMax M3.1 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, and Claude Haiku 5.5 passed the tests.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/2/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA comparative test shows that the Anslows UD-Q4 quantized version of Qwen3.8 Flash (125B) scores higher overall than the official Flash API in engineering delivery scenarios.68% similarUnverifiedMiniMax M3.1 Flash Preview emphasizes speed and can be used for quickly fixing bugs in code development.68% similarUnverifiedIn the receipt recognition task, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was twice as fast as Haiku 5.5.65% similarUnverifiedThere is no all-around winner among the three lightweight models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the highest quality but is slow, Haiku 5.5 is fast and leads in writing but lags in programming visual output, and GPT-6 Luna performed poorly on tasks.64% similarUnverifiedIn an auto-dungeon game test, V4.1 Flash completed the task in a single attempt, while other models typically required at least two attempts.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1067152API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1067152MCP
get_claim(id=1067152)