Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the same tests, Jev's median response time was 352 ms, Mistral Small 3.2 was 1,343 ms, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was 877 ms, and GPT-5 nano was 7,504 ms.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/2/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a test of 360 clean texts, Jev made only 1 misjudgment, gpt-5-mini made 1 misjudgment, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma each made 2 misjudgments, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b made 4 misjudgments, and Llama Guard 4 made 26 misjudgments.70% similarUnverifiedWith two to three attempts, GLM-5.3 Flash scored 82%, which is within the margin of error of GPT-5.6 Luna's 81%.68% similarUnverifiedFabrication rates when the total is fully obscured: Claude Sonnet 5 at 38%, Gemini 3 Flash at 21%, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at 44%, GPT-5.4 nano at 73%; fabrication rates when the total is half-obscured: Claude at 92%, the other three models all at 100%.66% similarUnverifiedOn the Frontier Code programming benchmark, the old model scored 34.4%, while Gemini 3.7 Flash improved to 43.6%.65% similarUnverifiedThe 78B parameter scale is in a similar range as Meta's Llama 3.1 70B and Mistral's Mixtral series64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1067288API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1067288MCP
get_claim(id=1067288)