Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The existing metric for measuring minor concentration, Participation Ratio (PR), has a fundamental flaw: its maximum value depends on network scale (the number of minors), making it impossible to judge, independent of architecture, whether a given PR value represents high or low concentration.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe number of minors grows combinatorially with network scale (input dimension and number of hidden units), which is the root of the PR metric's scale dependence.65% similarUnverifiedThe low consistency between the feedback score and the held-out score is essentially a concrete manifestation of overfitting and the generalization gap in the scenario of agent self-improvement.64% similarUnverifiedPR曲线在样本不平衡场景下更有价值，根本原因在于精确率的计算不涉及真负例（TN）的数量63% similarUnverifiedIgnoring error correlation causes the combined variance to be underestimated, and the underestimation factor grows with group size; this factor accurately predicts the degree of coverage failure.63% similarUnverifiedThe base rate fallacy points out that when targets are extremely rare, even a highly accurate system may produce a large proportion of false alarms among its alerts.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1068921API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1068921MCP
get_claim(id=1068921)