Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The core architectural rule of the AI tutor system is: the LLM never decides whether to help or how much to help—that is decided by ordinary code; the LLM is only responsible for writing out the wording of the hint after the decision has been made.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAI cannot be the sole dependency in a critical path; the fix philosophy is rules engine first, with LLM only as a fallback.69% similarUnverifiedThe security risk of AI agent architecture lies in the fact that LLM decision-making is probabilistic rather than deterministic, lacks an independent verification layer, and the LLM acts as both policy maker and execution initiator, violating the principle of separation of duties.69% similarUnverifiedIn AI governance discussions, there is a regulatory approach based on compute thresholds, that is, imposing stricter scrutiny only on frontier models exceeding a specific training compute, without affecting small- and medium-scale research and applications.66% similarUnverifiedThe Skill mechanism does not modify model weights; it only guides the model to organize existing knowledge in a specific format during the inference phase, and can therefore be enabled or disabled at any time.66% similarVerifiedWhen configuring AI Agents, permissions should be checked before prompts, because permission issues are more common than prompt issues when a task fails.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1069220API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1069220MCP
get_claim(id=1069220)