Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Compared with manual review, Policy as Code ensures consistency and auditability of verification, especially in high-frequency agent invocation scenarios where it avoids rule drift.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified严格分离评估代码与可优化代码，可以在评估体系冻结的前提下让人类信任Agent产出的结果并降低监督成本80% similarUnverifiedIntroducing agents into security reviews should serve as a supplement to existing automation rather than a replacement; stable, rule-based checks that are running well do not need to be rebuilt from scratch.78% similarUnverifiedHaving the same Agent both generate code and design test cases may create a self-validation blind spot, which needs to be balanced through stricter verification mechanisms and human spot-checks.77% similarUnverified成功的Agent评测产品形态可能是提供标准化执行引擎和验证原语并允许用户自定义测试场景，类似pytest之于测试而非封装好的黑盒76% similarUnverified基于规则过滤的Agent在对抗性测试中往往更容易被绕过，而经过对齐训练的模型具备更强的语义级意图识别能力76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1069240API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1069240MCP
get_claim(id=1069240)