Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
When screening agent project proposals, one should require the vendor to demonstrate a decision or action that the old process could not do, rather than show a smoother conversation.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen you tell an agent something is urgent, it may skip steps or start guessing in order to move fast, which should be avoided because engineering requires deterministic results.74% similarUnverifiedReview in agent systems should focus not only on whether the final output is correct, but also on whether the process that produced that output is trustworthy.71% similarUnverifiedThe following cases usually do not need an agent: the task can be solved in one response, the step sequence is known, tool selection can be expressed with ordinary conditionals, results must arrive within a strict latency budget, per-request cost must be predictable, erroneous actions are hard to undo, and it is impossible to define what successful completion looks like.71% similarUnverifiedPlacing human review at the end of an agent workflow is prone to failure because, by the final answer stage, the intermediate decision paths have been compressed or hidden, and reviewers cannot see the evidence the agent considered or discarded early on.70% similarUnverifiedWhen an agent's basis for judgment is insufficient and its confidence falls below a threshold, human intervention should be introduced, which is a risk-based dynamic review.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1070255API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1070255MCP
get_claim(id=1070255)