Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Three practical questions for judging whether code is drywall or load-bearing: Is it a one-off experiment or will it exist long-term? Is it depended on by other modules? Am I willing to let it go live without understanding it?
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Claude Code team believes that "whether a human has read the code" is an imprecise proxy metric, and the real question that should be asked is what could go wrong with this change and which kind of check (automated or human) is best suited to catch it.73% similarUnverifiedThe criterion for judging whether to use a visual tool: if you can clearly draw the entire logic in a flowchart within a few minutes, a visual tool is probably sufficient; if the branches are tangled and require repeated backtracking, then you may need to consider writing code.71% similarUnverifiedThe author poses four questions to be validated: whether the explanations are useful or merely create verbosity, whether the workflow helps in understanding unfamiliar codebases, which development stages need better guidance, and how to encourage learning without slowing down experienced developers.70% similarUnverified代码生成中的幻觉可通过语法检查甚至单元测试，却在集成测试或生产环境才暴露问题70% similarUnverifiedFour questions for assessing the code trust gap: Does the agent know the standards before it starts work? What is it allowed to touch, and what requires a human decision? Is there anything other than the model that wrote the code checking it? Can you show what was found and how it was resolved?70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1070634API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1070634MCP
get_claim(id=1070634)