Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Under the confusion matrix scenario set in the article, the false positive rate is about 72.73%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen evaluating a judge, one should look at the confusion matrix rather than just accuracy; if 90% of the samples are good answers to begin with, a judge that passes everything can still show 90% accuracy.69% similarUnverifiedIn a sandwich determination demo, the model returned 94% true and 6% false, with the entire decision taking 93 milliseconds.68% similarUnverified作者验证有93%的概率质量正确对齐，信息损失并非映射逻辑的bug68% similarUnverifiedOn math tasks, the accuracy was 79% when the model wrote out reasoning steps, and only 11% when it gave a bare number.68% similarUnverified对于稀疏度达到90%的投影矩阵，理论上可将推理计算量压缩至原始的十分之一67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1070859API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1070859MCP
get_claim(id=1070859)