Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In single-environment tests with 25 benign tasks and three frameworks, the probabilistic gate reduced completion rate to 56%, hard-blocked 4% of legitimate calls, and diverted 12–16% of legitimate calls into a delay queue, while no gate, the rule gate, and the LLM review gate all had completion rates of 68–72%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedTether's benchmark tests show a risky-call interception rate of 6/6 (100%), a legitimate-task false-block rate of 0/10 (0%), and 10/10 legitimate tasks uninterrupted after revocation.75% similarUnverifiedIn the ablation experiment, replacing the gate with the naïve check commonly used in unconstrained systems (fewer visible errors in recent trajectories), the same loop admitted 309 harmful changes and left the miss rate above 10% in 49 out of 90 runs.74% similarUnverifiedIn a benchmark of four enterprise agent architectures under 100 injected fault conditions (transient network timeouts, schema mismatches, empty search results), the naive self-reflection loop had an unconstrained runaway rate of 42.0%, median token consumption of 148,500 for failed tasks, mean time to failure of 18.4 minutes, and per-incident financial risk of $12.40.74% similarUnverifiedIn the benchmark's 60 runs, the early termination conditions were triggered 27 times, including 21 detections of lack of progress and 6 cases of model provider unavailability.74% similarVerifiedIn long-chain tasks, if each step has an error rate of approximately 5%, the overall success rate may drop to below 36% after 20 steps.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1070919API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1070919MCP
get_claim(id=1070919)