Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The retention window inferred from the two snapshots (the seller's own host data is consistent with a cutoff point between 29.55 and 37.77 days, with an 8.2-day gap) is not a schedulable plan and cannot be encoded as a TTL constant.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe community speculates that the 54-minute idle threshold very likely reserves buffer time to complete compaction before the cache TTL expires, but since the official documentation has not disclosed the specific TTL value or derivation formula, this is a reasonable inference.71% similarUnverifiedIdempotency records typically set a TTL of 24 hours to 7 days to align with the bank reconciliation window; a retry after the key expires will execute the payment again, and the mitigation is dual-layer storage (hot storage in Redis + cold storage in an immutable ledger).71% similarUnverifiedPrompt caching has a TTL limit, and after a long period of idleness it needs to be warmed up again.69% similarVerifiedThe cache is not permanently valid; providers usually have a TTL of a few minutes to an hour, and the hit rate fluctuates with user behavior.67% similarUnverifiedWhen choosing an intermediate stage to send back, one must weigh "the typical duration of the stage" together with "the platform's attribution window"; if a stage takes 45 days on average while the platform window is only 28 days, that signal will never be correctly attributed.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1072311API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1072311MCP
get_claim(id=1072311)