Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
ExtractBench Pro's evaluation results show that even the most advanced models perform poorly at perfectly solving complex extraction tasks.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/18/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAt present, attribution analysis of self-improving agents is still very difficult, making it hard to accurately distinguish whether a failure originates from model reasoning, observation of the environment state, or tool interface problems.72% similarUnverifiedFDE-Gym's experiments show that even when the Agent grasps all key facts, the conversion success rate is still less than half, indicating that current models have systematic shortcomings in planning and execution capability on long-chain complex tasks.71% similarUnverifiedIsolated task evaluation cannot capture cross-step error cascading effects; even high scores on individual subtasks cannot guarantee end-to-end process reliability.70% similarUnverifiedThe success or failure of a single case is insufficient to draw conclusions about a model; comprehensive evaluation across a multi-dimensional, multi-difficulty task matrix is required.70% similarUnverifiedWhen choosing a model, the key question is to find the model that passes the evaluation set with acceptable accuracy and has the lowest running cost, not the smartest model.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1073165API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1073165MCP
get_claim(id=1073165)