Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In evaluations across 22 benchmarks and eight open-source and proprietary backbone models, OpenVLHarness improves by an average of 9.7–12.6 points over matched tool-free baselines.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/18/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedConsolidating 13 classes into 10 (merging the classes most confused by the model) improved the average OA by 8.4 percentage points.63% similarUnverifiedAfter matched supervised training, model performance improved to 99.8%, while removing the relational links caused accuracy to plummet to 23.4%, even below the best shortcut's 27.0%.63% similarUnverifiedOpenAI officially claims the Decisions API is about 10 times faster than the Responses API, but it did not disclose benchmarks and did not publish head-to-head accuracy comparisons with competitors.63% similarUnverifiedThe 7 models that passed the surrogate test had a change rate of 15.9%, while the 6 models that did not pass had a rate as high as 25.8%, indicating that better-performing models are less susceptible to interference but still more so than the effect of prompt modification.62% similarUnverifiedIn Claude Code's search-disabled (full loading) mode, the cost of 7 grouped tools was equivalent to 14 individual tools with 100% accuracy; the grouping strategy only yields clear benefits in scenarios where schemas are fully injected.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1073232API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1073232MCP
get_claim(id=1073232)