Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The deployment study froze three programs refined via reference-consistency on the development set and evaluated them on 600 held-out questions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/18/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe experiments used three training random seeds paired with a fixed test set split, along with a limited hyperparameter tuning budget.66% similarUnverifiedAnytime-valid methods based on test martingales are designed to avoid the type I error inflation caused by traditional p-values in scenarios of multiple testing or continuous monitoring.63% similarUnverifiedThe experiments covered three types of regulatory reinterpretation, three severity levels, and 10 random seeds per level; out of 7,449 candidate changes, the gate-constrained loop admitted only 144.63% similarUnverifiedThe author proposes three countable output metrics—Landed, Dropped, and Reverted—tallying respectively the number of tasks merged into the release branch, the number of PRs closed without being merged, and the number of changes reverted after being merged.62% similarUnverifiedThe local evaluation used a small evaluation set containing seven question-and-expected-answer pairs; in the first round of testing four passed and three failed, with failure causes including omitting known facts, skipping follow-up questions, and triggering rate limits.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1073917API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1073917MCP
get_claim(id=1073917)