Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The adversarial split F1 measured on LLaVA-1.5-7B is 82.21, 1.21 to 8.67 points higher than the three adversarial baselines compared against (81.00, 79.30, 73.54).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/18/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAfter switching to an eight-token lookup table covering the space-prefixed forms, LLaVA-1.5-7B achieves F1 of 0.8221, 0.8498, and 0.8713 on the adversarial, popular, and random splits respectively; fixing the reading alone moves the adversarial split by 6.13 points.77% similarUnverifiedTRACER-7B surpasses the strongest baseline by 11.4 points on the conversion rate F1 metric.70% similarUnverifiedIn the multi-channel forging process case study, ES-CP achieved a macro F1 score of 0.8266% similarUnverifiedCriticGen's F1 scores on criteria-based rationales and actionable suggestions improved from 0.6369/0.5994 to 0.7554/0.7900, respectively.65% similarUnverifiedStandard Jev achieves an average macro-F1 of 62.93%, while the strongest LLM baseline achieves 67.28%.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1074063API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1074063MCP
get_claim(id=1074063)