Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
A reasonable positioning is to treat the Eval Agent as an "amplifier of expert judgment" rather than a replacement: the Agent is responsible for coverage and consistency, while humans are responsible for adjudicating difficult cases.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDefining a clear role for the Agent (such as "You are an email triage assistant. You are precise and conservative. When unsure, flag for the user rather than acting on your own.") establishes a decision framework and prevents overreach.80% similarUnverifiedIn the old Harness design, the AI reviewer Agent would be systematically persuaded by the executor Agent, because the executor Agent could attach confident explanations, plausible reasoning chains, or impeccably formatted intermediate artifacts.78% similarVerifiedAgent的核心公式为：Agent = 大模型 + 工具调用 + 自主决策能力78% similarUnverifiedAn agent may confidently submit a PR that looks reasonable on the surface but actually violates the spec, so human review cannot be omitted.78% similarUnverifiedHaving Agents handle analysis and drafting work while leaving the final judgment to humans is a pragmatic middle path that balances Agent productivity with safety boundaries78% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1079604API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1079604MCP
get_claim(id=1079604)