Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
Bilibili uploader "护身最高" used the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash model to run a comparative review of 12 Agents, with a total test cost of 6.77 yuan, 908 calls, and 45.2 million Tokens consumed.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/4/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Partially VerifiedIn the "pelican riding a bicycle" SVG prompt test, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's output cost 23 cents, while Opus 5.5 cost $6, making the former about 26 times cheaper, but DeepSeek took 1 hour while Opus took only 20 minutes.78% similarUnverifiedA community benchmark completed before the September 10 price cut (300 million tokens, 14 task groups, over 2,400 requests) shows that under the same billing basis, V4.1 Flash's total cost is 36% higher than the previous version.73% similarUnverifiedUnder an assumed Agent bug-fixing session of 40 calls, 1.2 million input tokens (90% cache hit rate) and 60,000 output tokens, calculated at AIHubMix list prices, Flash 1017 costs $0.118 at peak hours and $0.059 off-peak; Pro 0813 costs $0.469 at peak and $0.233 off-peak; Pro costs about four times as much per session as Flash.73% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash L017 reaches a 77% pass rate on the DDSWE coding benchmark, at an average cost of only 1.3 yuan per task.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1081905API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1081905MCP
get_claim(id=1081905)