Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
REVIEW.md is written by CODEOWNERS, tells reviewers what genuinely matters in the code, and can suppress nitpicky false positives about historical code outside the current change.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Claude Code's Six-Layer Code Review System Explained: REVIEW.md and AI Review Practices
bilibiliGoldenSpiderAI10/20/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedREVIEW.md is a project-level review-preferences file read by Claude Code, specifically setting out review preferences such as which patterns must be blocked and how comments should be graded.75% similarUnverifiedA 2013 Microsoft Research paper, 'Expectations, Outcomes, and Challenges of Modern Code Review,' points out that the core value of code review lies not only in bug discovery but also in knowledge sharing and the implicit alignment of coding standards.73% similarUnverifiedHuman review is the last line of defense against absurd outputs entering the codebase.72% similarUnverifiedCo-Review offers four reusable review scenarios: a whole-codebase audit, reviewing the agent's own changes, reviewing someone else's Pull Request, and designing before writing code.70% similarUnverifiedValidator Agent发现Bug后会将Story状态从Coding Complete回退到Coding，增加Retry Count，写入详细的test_report.md，Coder读取后修复，形成自动闭环70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1082605API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1082605MCP
get_claim(id=1082605)