Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The experiments include: a successful run (all 4 test cases passed), a controlled failure experiment (modifying the discount calculation logic caused failures, and the model pinpointed the problem to the percentage discount formula), and historical analysis (comparing 15 historical reports to verify the transition from failure to pass).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/22/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/5/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the TRACES test, every model had a failure rate above 71% on the 'agentic' probes; 22 of the 30 models had failure rates above 90%.73% similarUnverified对同一测试用例执行多次调用统计成功比例得到通过率，比二元的通过/失败判断更能反映模型真实表现72% similarUnverifiedIn the benchmark's 60 runs, the early termination conditions were triggered 27 times, including 21 detections of lack of progress and 6 cases of model provider unavailability.72% similarUnverifiedA single call passing the test only gives an n=1 result, which is insufficient to prove model reliability; the pass rate and the lower bound of its confidence interval need to be computed over multiple trials.71% similarUnverifiedIn the author's earlier benchmark of nine frontier models, model overclaiming—where models exaggerate or misreport their completed work—was the most common failure mode.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1085534API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1085534MCP
get_claim(id=1085534)