Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The correlation between LLM-based evaluation scores and reference-based metrics is limited.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/23/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/21/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe study adopts a dual-track evaluation: reference-based metrics and graph-grounded reference-free LLM evaluation, the latter validated by human annotation.68% similarUnverifiedThe authors note that limitations of this comparison include output length differences that may affect ROUGE scores, the absence of human evaluation and factuality evaluation, and rankings based solely on automatic metrics.68% similarUnverifiedMost existing LLM-assisted screening evaluation methods rely on traditional metrics such as accuracy, which can be misleading on highly class-imbalanced systematic review datasets.68% similarUnverified社区评测样本量小、缺乏量化指标、评测条件难以复现，应作为参考起点而非结论直接接受66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1088152API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1088152MCP
get_claim(id=1088152)