Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
This design responds to two typical risks when agentic search is put into practice: first, agent outputs lacking traceable evidence, and second, error accumulation leading to loss of control over the task.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe risk of false positives—incorrectly classifying normal agent behavior as out-of-bounds and quarantining it—will directly affect the platform's practical utility.78% similarVerifiedThe core challenges facing multi-agent architectures include the rationality of task decomposition, the risk of hallucination contagion between agents, and the rising task failure rate caused by error accumulation in long workflows.75% similarUnverifiedTraditional observability focuses on technical failure signals (exceptions, error codes, timeouts, tool unavailability), but in agent scenarios what is truly dangerous is successful violations where a call succeeds and returns 200 but the business action crosses the line.75% similarUnverifiedThe project's observations found: the gap between the notice rate and the safe action rate is far larger than expected -- a model can flag a risk in its reasoning trajectory but still issue a dangerous tool call two steps later, because there is no mechanism in the scaffolding to enforce a hard stop when a risk is detected. This is a system design gap, not just a model capability gap.75% similarUnverifiedThe first difficulty a self-evolving Harness faces is the design of the evaluation signal, because whether a task succeeds is often sparse, delayed feedback.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1088759API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1088759MCP
get_claim(id=1088759)