Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
If results are injected via a separate session rather than as a follow-up turn of the same run, the parent agent needs to restate the task context, and the two sets of state easily fall out of sync.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAfter the background sub-agent mechanism update, sub-agents pass their results back to the parent agent upon completion, returned as a follow-up turn within the same run.73% similarUnverifiedRule two: monitor the conversation state between agents; if two consecutive rounds produce no new valid information (such as repeating the same viewpoint or unchanged output), it is judged as convergence stagnation, triggering termination or human intervention.70% similarUnverifiedIn a typical multi-agent framework, after a sub-agent task ends, its conversation context is often collapsed or removed from the active view, requiring users to manually search through historical session records.69% similarUnverifiedEarly multi-agent implementations mostly used fire-and-forget semantics, with sub-agent results collected via polling, callbacks or separate session channels, and no shared execution trace between parent and child.69% similarUnverifiedThe Record & Replay approach has a path-binding problem for Agents with dynamic decision-making capabilities: once an Agent chooses a different call path, it causes replay mismatches.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1089184API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1089184MCP
get_claim(id=1089184)