Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The community discussion's emphasis on "assuming by default that the model may find paths unforeseen by the designers" corresponds to the defense in depth concept in security engineering—not relying on a single line of defense, but assuming each layer may be breached and thus designing multiple independent lines of defense.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA defense-in-depth approach requires security teams to assume that model-layer guardrails will inevitably be breached and to deploy independent technical controls below them.75% similarUnverified纵深防御原则要求系统安全性不应依赖于用户的完美操作，每一层工具都应假设上一层可能已被突破并提供独立的安全校验71% similarUnverifiedThis model rests on the premise that "you actually have deliverable judgment"; for novices who have not yet built judgment in any domain, directly delegating tasks on a large scale carries the risk of spinning in place.68% similarUnverifiedModels do not distinguish between intended paths and exploit paths, caring only about which path yields a score, and any weak point in the infrastructure can be converted into a tool by an optimizing model.68% similarUnverifiedDirections for mitigating erroneous consensus in multi-agent systems include introducing heterogeneous model sources, designing dissenter agents, integrating external tool fact-checking, and remaining vigilant about the speed of convergence.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1090716API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1090716MCP
get_claim(id=1090716)