Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the same test environment, Tongyi Qianwen Image 2.1 completes sampling in about 43 seconds, while MOSS-Image completes sampling in just over 30 seconds, so MOSS-Image samples slightly faster.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/8/2026
Sources
Open-Source Image Model MOSS-Image Local Deployment Review: Anime & Speed Benchmarks
bilibiliAI视频零基础入门10/25/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a local consumer-grade GPU environment, generating images with both the MOSS-Image and Tongyi Qianwen Image 2.1 modules enabled, the full round consistently takes between just over 80 seconds and 92 seconds.73% similarUnverifiedIn a test with 1,000 candidate options, CLM took approximately 44 milliseconds, while a generative model required 579 milliseconds.71% similarUnverifiedIn the same test, Sage Attention (Auto) took 14.24 seconds, while PyTorch's default attention took 23.16 seconds.71% similarUnverifiedSome users found in tests with 3 coding prompts that completion times were consistently in the 30–45 second range, with 3.8 Flash being at most about 5 seconds faster.70% similarUnverifiedIn an email classification demo, the model completed classification within 39 milliseconds, which according to the video is approximately one-third of Jev's actual time.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1096329API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1096329MCP
get_claim(id=1096329)