Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The author believes that when the model's ability to write code is no longer the bottleneck, the engineering focus shifts to how to verify the agent's output, and Agent Config's answer is to build the checking process into the agent's workflow, making "self-checking" a default action rather than an after-the-fact remedy.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAgent Config's design includes "look before you leap" (the agent analyzes the codebase before changing code), an end-to-end workflow (from planning and implementation to testing and review), multi-perspective review (approaching from the four angles of bugs, security, tests and code quality), memory and project context, on-demand loading of skills and rules, and support for multiple coding tools.77% similarUnverifiedThe agent invokes the Credo inspection standards configured by the project itself, rather than a generic rule set.76% similarUnverifiedTo judge whether a team is truly moving toward agent-native, you can look at where its bottleneck is: if the bottleneck shifts from "writing code" to "coordination, integration, verification," then redesigning the infrastructure becomes meaningful.75% similarUnverifiedThe author advocates involving the Agent earlier (by posing ambiguous problems and having it propose multiple solutions) and letting it run independently for longer (self-verifying, invoking a code review bot, and dispatching sub-agents for re-examination).75% similarUnverifiedHaving the Agent plan first and then write code, and requiring human confirmation at uncertain points, can prevent rework caused by the Agent improvising.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1097197API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1097197MCP
get_claim(id=1097197)