Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
CLE evaluation is judged by a dedicated evaluation agent according to human-written scoring criteria for each submission.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe "evaluation" method is essentially unit testing for skills: launching multiple sub-agents, with the main coordinating agent setting the scoring criteria, the sub-agents executing tasks in independent directories, and the directory names deliberately designed so the sub-agents do not realize they are being evaluated.72% similarUnverifiedEvaluation measures output quality through predefined test sets and scoring criteria, with dimensions including accuracy, relevance, faithfulness, and harmful content detection.72% similarUnverifiedUsing automatic metrics for preliminary screening, manual spot checks for calibration, and feeding human feedback back into the reviewer's rules is a viable compromise that balances automated evaluation with human aesthetics.72% similarUnverifiedAgent evaluation is a composite evaluation of decision quality and execution quality: it must check not only whether decisions are correct, but also whether actions are executed, whether execution is complete, and whether there is extra disclosure during the process.72% similarUnverifiedRigorous evaluation usually requires referencing results on public code benchmarks (such as HumanEval, SWE-bench, etc.) and conducting side-by-side comparisons under identical prompts and context conditions.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1102570API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1102570MCP
get_claim(id=1102570)