Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
A failed model-judge call is never stored as "no conflict"; such failure states are handled separately.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA single failure case cannot fully negate a model's programming capability, nor is it sufficient to serve as hard evidence for cross-model comparison.79% similarUnverifiedWhen comparing model patches, you should not tell one model about another model's failure, nor quietly fix up an answer before testing, in order to keep the comparison fair.70% similarUnverifiedThe failure of self-review is a structural problem rather than a model capability problem: any single judge will systematically miss the problems it itself created.68% similarUnverifiedThe team mandates that the judge model can never be the same as the model being evaluated, in order to avoid self-scoring bias.68% similarUnverifiedThe tester believed the cause of failure was not the model itself, but the interaction between the model and the test harness.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1102753API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1102753MCP
get_claim(id=1102753)