Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Quantitative risk metrics (standard deviation, Beta, maximum drawdown, annualized volatility) can only describe historical risk characteristics, cannot predict the future, and do not cover structural risks such as liquidity and concentration.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe threshold of "marginal risk being equivalent to other risks" is extremely difficult to quantify, as there is currently neither a widely accepted metric nor a sufficiently neutral institution to adjudicate it.72% similarUnverifiedThe low-probability, high-impact risk framework originates from expected utility theory and catastrophic risk research.70% similarUnverifiedNon-recursive risk measures apply a risk measure once to the cumulative return of an entire trajectory and suffer from time inconsistency.69% similarUnverifiedFrontier large models perform poorly at directly predicting alignment risks on ALIGNMENTFORECASTBENCH.68% similarUnverifiedBayesian methods can use historical failure rates as a prior and combine them with new observations to update the posterior distribution, conservatively estimating true risk when samples are scarce68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1103281API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1103281MCP
get_claim(id=1103281)