Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Permission checks at the tool-call layer are more critical, and agents should be forced to require human confirmation or secondary authorization before performing sensitive operations, especially in scenarios involving write operations, external communication, and credential use.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/28/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn independent test controller should submit known requests in a secure environment and read the actual routing or approval status, embodying the principle of separation of duties.79% similarUnverifiedFor tools that change state, idempotency keys or equivalent protective mechanisms should be used, and tool inputs should be validated and authorization enforced at the application layer77% similarUnverifiedTraditional permission checks typically target a single action or a single Skill rather than cross-Skill information flow and authorization propagation, so static compliance of runtime permissions does not equal compositional safety, and a dynamic, cross-boundary authorization verification mechanism needs to be introduced.76% similarVerifiedWhether an agent requirement is viable can be judged based on whether the task structure is clear, whether the data is controllable, and whether the results are verifiable.76% similarUnverified最有价值的Agent指令是那些能被明确验证的，如'提交前必须通过npm test'，相比模糊指令更能影响Agent行为76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1109998API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1109998MCP
get_claim(id=1109998)