Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
It is suggested that initially MCP tools be made fine-grained with single responsibilities, paired with a permission policy that separates read and write operations, and then iteratively converged based on actual call logs.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified建议在自定义MCP工具实现中主动向代理返回操作后的相关日志摘要，将两次工具调用合并为一次，以压缩迭代轮次并降低token消耗与延迟79% similarUnverifiedMCP tools declare their own semantics through annotations (such as readOnlyHint and idempotentHint), and the client decides the retry strategy accordingly; only tools explicitly marked as read-only or idempotent are suitable for automatic retry when a connection is interrupted.77% similarUnverifiedIf a Skill involves data retrieval or requires calling an MCP during the process, the MCPs to be used should be explicitly listed in the very first step of the implementation logic.77% similarUnverifiedCodeSmith takes a conservative approach to MCP capability determination: only discovery-type helpers with list_mcp/read_mcp in their names count as read-only, and everything else is treated as requiring approval and requiring network.77% similarUnverifiedIn scenarios with strict auditing requirements for tool calls, an independent MCP gateway can provide finer-grained control.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1110652API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1110652MCP
get_claim(id=1110652)