Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Carbon's "swap-to-refusal rate" (hallucination or erroneous generation rate) rose from 4% to 11%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/12/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGemini 4 Carbon's answer accuracy rose from 48% to 58%, but its hallucination rate rose from 4% to 11%.69% similarUnverifiedAt a 1% false positive rate, adding routing telemetry improved the true positive rate by 2.7 to 9.4 percentage points.60% similarUnverifiedCompared with Argon, Carbon's unsupported claims are reduced by about 2 times, overly overreaching behavior is reduced by 26%, and under-serving is reduced by 29%.60% similarUnverifiedRecent research indicates that some models perform 10–15 percentage points higher on known contaminated benchmark subsets than on uncontaminated subsets.59% similarUnverifiedIn the application to neural-network correction of emission inventories, the error of biogenic source correction was reduced by a factor of 2.4–5, and low-temperature emission information that a single inversion would lose was recovered.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1111558API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1111558MCP
get_claim(id=1111558)