Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a test to create a landing page for a hardware device launch, MiniMax spent only 1 cent to complete it, while Opus 5 required $1.22, making it nearly 88 times cheaper and also 4 times faster.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/12/2026
Sources
AI Buzz Weekly: GPT-6.5 Leak, New Claude Model, and MiniMax's Cost-Effectiveness
bilibiliTHE_OREGANO10/29/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a comparison test recreating a Tesla Roadster police car chase scene, MiniMax spent $2.34 to complete the task and DeepSeek spent about $3.07, making MiniMax about 24% cheaper.73% similarUnverifiedA multiplier of around 0.6 means that almost all Coding Plan call prices on the market will be cheaper than the new billing under DeepSeek V4 Pro.71% similarUnverifiedIn the official egg-protection demonstration, using Haiku 5.5 with 10 sub-agents tried 86 designs in 58 seconds at a cost of $0.14, while Opus 5.5 running alone took 3 minutes and 37 seconds, tried 25 designs, and cost $0.47.71% similarUnverifiedThe experiments use three mid-tier judges: two local models (Qwen 9B/4B, run via Ollama) and one gpt-4o-mini, with total API spending of $0.29.70% similarUnverifiedArtificial Analysis previously measured the V4-Flash series and found its per-task cost far lower than competitors (3 cents in its testing framework, versus $1.86 for GPT-5.6 Sol).70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1111900API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1111900MCP
get_claim(id=1111900)