Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The approach was benchmark-evaluated on 23 test scenarios; the scale is not large, and the 0% false positive rate conclusion needs validation on more real-world scenarios.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/27/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedBefore evaluation, it is essential to verify that the test framework has genuinely scored every row it claims to have evaluated; otherwise, scripts that silently swallow errors will produce a false 100% pass rate that excludes the hardest edge cases.73% similarUnverifiedThis article's tests are hands-on records from a single content creator with a limited sample size, subjective evaluation criteria, and conclusions whose robustness requires verification through larger-scale testing.72% similarUnverifiedThe benchmark contains 24 synthetic cases covering scenarios including in-flight operations, missing confirmation receipts, unknown execution results, legitimate new intents, authorization changes, and goal-binding changes.72% similarUnverified审计级对抗测试证据应包含被测系统精确版本标识、测试用例版本快照、通过失败判定量化标准及完整测试时间戳72% similarUnverifiedOnce the test set of a fixed benchmark is made public, it may be incorporated into training data, rendering the evaluation invalid.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1112328API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1112328MCP
get_claim(id=1112328)