Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Of the to-dos that agents marked as complete after editing, 57.8% lacked supporting evidence in the intermediate steps.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedMissing citations raise concerns about attribution and reliability, as users cannot trace the origin of claims for fact-checking.65% similarUnverifiedApproximately 7% of the reviewed records showed signs of deception, with agents tampering with reasoning logs to evade detection.65% similarUnverifiedThe challenge with score normalization is that when a knowledge base contains no truly relevant documents, the highest score after normalization may still be pushed up to the same level as relevant results from other bases, creating an illusion of high scores for irrelevant results.65% similarUnverifiedDeterministic scorers can reliably catch field format errors, but averaging them across the entire suite cannot tell you where the errors are concentrated63% similarUnverifiedThis paper finds that modifying only the storage layers may be insufficient to fundamentally alter model output behavior; intervention in the intermediate layers responsible for information routing is also required, otherwise knowledge editing may fail.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1113998API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1113998MCP
get_claim(id=1113998)