Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
LLM-IRA reaches or numerically exceeds strong static fusion baselines on 5 of the 6 evaluation benchmarks.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/28/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the DL19 and DL20 benchmarks, LLM-IRA already surpasses the best unsupervised baseline with only 5 LLM calls per query, far from exhausting the typical budget of 25–30 calls.65% similarUnverifiedAcross six configurations covering five groups of heterogeneous agent combinations, HMA improved the any-medal rate by an average of 6.4 percentage points over its constituent baseline agents.64% similarUnverifiedGLM-5.3在六项评测中的成绩为：终端编程基准3.0得28.3、深度软件工程基准得66.9、智能体中场考试得28.5、自动化基准得48.2、带工具的人类终极考试得62.5、GDP价值评估AA2版得17.6961% similarUnverifiedThe McNemar test p-values for the comparison of EMBER and ORBIT with the LLM baseline are 1.3e-9 and 1.5e-6, respectively, which is statistically significant.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114249API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114249MCP
get_claim(id=1114249)