Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The authors establish high-probability finite-sample suboptimality guarantees, quantifying the effects of approximation error, estimation error, source-to-target shift, offline coverage and sample size.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe study establishes non-asymptotic bounds on the conditional score estimation error, i.e., bounds that hold for finite sample sizes78% similarUnverifiedThe error-corrected estimator needs to incorporate the sampling error of sensitivity and false positive rate (calibration uncertainty) into the confidence interval of the final accuracy, rather than treating judge decisions as error-free ground truth.75% similarUnverifiedThe convergence rate bounds depend jointly on the spectral properties of the measurement error, the latent exposure, and the target functional74% similarUnverifiedCalibration error should be weighted by the consequences of decisions within the uncertainty interval, not simply averaged.74% similarUnverifiedThe uncertainty evaluation method proposed in the paper comprises three core steps: transferring the threshold to the target triggering condition; designing a statistical test to judge, at a given error probability, whether the performance target is applicable, not applicable, or undetermined; and computing a lower bound on the number of independent units required for an applicable conclusion.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114873API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114873MCP
get_claim(id=1114873)