Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Testers said Gemini 4 Carbon is two to four times slower than Argon and takes longer to think; completing the tests generated a total of 200 million tokens versus only 64 million for a typical model, averaging about 21 minutes per task.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/31/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/14/2026
Sources
Gemini 4 Carbon Tops the Charts but Remains Restricted to Cybersecurity Experts
bilibili皮皮蟹勇闯天涯10/30/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the C++ skateboarding game test, Gemini 4 Argon took about 40 minutes to generate, with acceptable playability, but the level of detail was far from expectations; in the second round, after referencing a Sonnet 5.5 video, it generated an improved version in about 70 minutes, but the overall graphical fidelity was still inferior to the Claude series.72% similarUnverifiedIn the robot arm grasping task, Gemini 4 Argon completed it in about 22 minutes, the second-fastest completion speed to date.70% similarUnverifiedIn segmentation tasks, Gemini 4 Argon takes about 2 minutes per image, while the traditional model Soul can complete it in sub-second time.69% similarUnverifiedGemini 4's Tasks feature ran for 30 minutes when processing multi-format files without producing a presentation, while ordinary chat mode completed the task within one minute; the stability of Tasks remains to be seen.68% similarUnverifiedGoogle had Gemini 4 Argon run unattended for 11 hours to optimize the ADK Python agent (about 200,000 lines of code), yielding six proposed optimizations, two of which were adopted and shipped, cutting long-session preparation time by about 40%.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1120853API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1120853MCP
get_claim(id=1120853)