Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Research in the field of flight automation has long shown that when a system gives incorrect suggestions, human operators' error-correction ability drops significantly because they no longer actively monitor.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/31/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedResearch by NASA and the FAA found that pilots who over-rely on autopilot systems experience a 'skill degradation trap'—their manual flying abilities deteriorate and their emergency responses slow when systems fail.76% similarUnverifiedA 1994 study by Mosier and Skitka found that even when an automated system gave obviously erroneous recommendations, well-trained pilots still had a significant probability of blindly complying.75% similarUnverifiedAutomation bias has been extensively documented in highly automated fields such as aviation and medical imaging diagnosis, where operators often choose to defer to rather than question clearly erroneous results75% similarVerifiedAutomation bias refers to the tendency of people to progressively reduce their scrutiny and questioning of system outputs when working with automated systems over time, and was first systematically studied in the aviation field.74% similarUnverifiedIn the vast majority of real cases, so-called 'system rogue behavior' can be traced back to specific technical causes such as configuration errors, crawler policies, and missing rate limiting, rather than autonomous AI behavior.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1121352API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1121352MCP
get_claim(id=1121352)