Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Full Send's proof mechanism requires the model to verify the change itself, for example by reproducing the original failure, applying the fix, and re-running the reproduction to confirm it passes; running the repository's CI checks; writing targeted tests for fixes that lack tests; or running the app to verify UI and runtime behavior.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedProofsource's agent drafts and publishes fixes after user approval, verifies whether answers have changed, and learns from each modification.74% similarUnverifiedRunning test cases to verify code is execution-based verification, and its feedback comes from the real results of program execution, fully decoupled from any subjective judgment of the model.73% similarUnverifiedThe feedback loop requires the agent to automatically validate its own output at the end of each phase (such as running unit tests, checking for type errors, and verifying build success), and these automated validation mechanisms constitute the safety net of AFK mode.72% similarUnverifiedIn practice, contract testing or record-and-replay mechanisms are usually introduced, using fixed samples to verify whether an adapter still parses correctly after a protocol change, limiting the risk of version drift to a controllable range.72% similarVerifiedThe actionable method for validating a coding model is to select a real repair task with tests, fix the repository version and tool permissions, have candidate models complete the same task, and compare first-pass rate, patch readability, per-run cost, and number of human takeovers.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1122093API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1122093MCP
get_claim(id=1122093)