Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
With GLiNER, the average score in the Doom game more than doubled compared with using the Jev AI API.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn comparisons in the Doom game environment, GLiNER can make 8.8 decisions per second, while Jev AI can make only 2.5 decisions per second.76% similarUnverifiedIn the fourth round of fusion experiments, treating JEV as the 9th framework and taking the highest score yielded an overall accuracy of 81.5%, but parity dropped back to 50%.55% similarUnverifiedIn evaluations on the ImageNet-C benchmark with six csOOD datasets, TALOR's H-score is 2.2% higher than the next-best method UniEnt.53% similarUnverifiedAn independent developer tested the Jev model with 1,200 multiple-choice questions across multiple disciplines; in the highest-confidence tier, the model reported an average confidence of 98.7% while the actual accuracy was 96.3%, a difference of approximately 2.4 percentage points.53% similarUnverifiedo1模型在国际数学奥林匹克预选题上的表现接近金牌水平，在Codeforces编程竞赛中达到了89百分位53% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1123705API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1123705MCP
get_claim(id=1123705)