Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The ranking ability of LLM self-reported uncertainty was roughly comparable to the uncertainty estimates of the baseline models and did not demonstrate an ability beyond classical methods.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedLLM calls have inherent uncertainty: the same input may produce different outputs, token consumption and latency fluctuate significantly, and the reasoning path of an Agent is difficult to predict.80% similarUnverifiedBefore deploying LLMs in high-stakes professional settings, the underlying model reasoning may be unreliable beneath a surface of high accuracy, making rigorous testing of contextual adaptability indispensable.73% similarUnverified由于LLM的输出带有不确定性，Agent场景下无法保证两次调用生成的参数完全一致，这使得幂等键的生成和匹配比传统系统更复杂72% similarUnverifiedThe credible interval in Bayesian methods can be directly interpreted as the probability that a parameter falls within the range, providing a more intuitive quantification of uncertainty than the frequentist confidence interval.72% similarVerifiedLLM output is non-deterministic; due to the non-associativity of floating-point operations and differences in context windows, even with identical inputs, outputs are difficult to reproduce exactly and do not possess idempotency.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1124959API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1124959MCP
get_claim(id=1124959)