Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
To judge whether an explanation is worth giving, you can ask: is this explanation supplementing necessary context, or is it defending a decision already made? The former is worth writing; the latter can usually be omitted.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedQuestions framed around a clear decision (e.g. 'for or against, give one reason each') produce sharper debate than broad topics (e.g. 'any thoughts').72% similarUnverified作者建议将 ShouldBuild 的裁决作为决策的参考输入而非唯一依据，最好与付费意愿验证相结合71% similarUnverifiedWhen people start arguing about whose dashboard is right, that indicates a definition problem and requires an authoritative source rather than re-querying in every conversation.71% similarUnverifiedThe detailed feedback condition simultaneously includes the decision, reasoning, and attempt history, so this comparison cannot isolate the effect of the explanation alone.70% similarUnverifiedIn legal practice, a 'meaningful explanation' refers to information sufficient for the person concerned to raise an effective objection, not a vague risk score.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1126631API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1126631MCP
get_claim(id=1126631)