Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the comparison with and without boundary contract information, the macro edit-selection F1 score rose from 0.440 to 0.682.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 2/1/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCSP improves the F1 score for rule consistency determination from 0.90 to 0.94.73% similarUnverifiedThe Rejection Sampling method achieves an accuracy of 0.797 and a span F1 of 0.556, with verbatim citation improving from 0.597 to 0.701.71% similarUnverifiedWhen the number of observations for a category is 0, its F1 may formally be defined as 0 or skipped, but there is no basis at all for estimating performance on that category.70% similarUnverifiedOn the 143 held-out samples, the classifier achieved 0.94 accuracy, with F1 scores of Bug 0.96, Docs 0.88, and Enhancement 0.91.70% similarUnverifiedThe framework achieved a precision of 0.82, a recall of 0.85, and an F1 score of 0.82.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1129120API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1129120MCP
get_claim(id=1129120)